Research - Schukajlow - Deaprtment of Mathematics Education and Computer Science Education

Research Project ViMo 2 (Duration: from 2024)

Funding Organisation

German Research Foundation [Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft]

Abstract

Empirical findings on the effectiveness of drawing instructions to promote students’ modelling competencies in the field of geometry are mixed and indicate that drawing-specific strategy knowledge (strategic knowledge about drawing, SKD) plays an important role. Results from the first phase of funding (“ViMo 1”) have confirmed that declarative SKD (i.e., knowledge about the characteristics of a good drawing) is a necessary but not sufficient precondition for producing drawings with a high level of accuracy and for finding a solution to a modeling problem. The overarching goal of the follow-up project “ViMo 2” is therefore to investigate what role procedural SKD (i.e., knowledge of how to construct and use a drawing in the modeling process) plays in the effective use of drawings and in modeling performance by students in the field of geometry. In addition to procedural SKD, we are also taking into account declarative SKD as well as cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational factors. Within the framework of the follow-up project, theoretical, empirical, and practice-relevant findings can be expected in the following areas: First, the project will provide findings on the potential of strategy training for promoting mathematical modelling competencies in the field of geometry. Second, the project will contribute to research on self-generated drawings. Compared with the first phase of funding, the recording and analysis of eye movements promises additional insights into the mechanisms behind instruction in drawing at the level of strategy execution. The use of EMME (Eye Movement Modeling Examples) also promises insights into the potential of this innovative form of instruction for mathematics and science learning. Third, the project will contribute to learning strategy research. We expect to confirm and expand relationships postulated in Borkowski et al.’s (2000) theoretical model by distinguishing between declarative and procedural parts of SKD. Fourth, regarding practical implications, the learning environment that we are developing in the project can be used in mathematics instruction.

Research Project ViMo (Duration: 2015-2022)

Funding Organisation

German Research Foundation [Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft]

Abstract

Modelling competency is important for students' current and future lives. Empirical research in this domain has shown that students' ability to solve real-word problems is poor and that stu-dents usually do not achieve a sufficient level of modelling competency in the regular class-room (Blum, 2011; Blum et al., 2007). One instructional element that can improve students' modelling competency is drawing a diagram to represent a modelling problem. However, re-sults on the effects of drawings on students' mathematics' performance have not been con-sistent (De Bock et al., 2003). One reason for these inconsistent results may be that previous studies have not paid sufficient attention to students' knowledge and quality of drawings. In the proposed project (Visualizations while solving modelling problems, ViMo), we will investigate the interplay between different types of drawings and students' strategy knowledge, quality of drawings, motivational predispositions, and performance.

Publications

Journal Articles (peer-reviewed)

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., & Leopold, C. (2022). Effects of drawing instructions and strategic knowledge on mathematical modeling performance: Mediated by the use of the drawing strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3930

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., & Leopold, C. (2021). Does strategic knowledge matter? Effects of strategic knowledge about drawing on students' modelling competencies in the domain of geometry. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2012741

Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., Rellensmann, J., & Leopold, C. (2021). The role of strategy-based motivation in mathematical problem solving: the case of learner-generated drawings. Learning and Instruction, Article 101561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101561

Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., Rellensmann, J., & Leopold, C. (2021). Do emotions and prior performance facilitate the use of the learner-generated drawing strategy? Effects of enjoyment, anxiety, and intramathematical performance on the use of the drawing strategy and modelling performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101967 Preprint

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Leopold, C. (2020). Measuring and investigating strategic knowledge about drawing to solve geometry modelling problems. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 97-110

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Leopold, C. (2017). Make a drawing. Effects of strategic knowledge, drawing accuracy, and type of drawing on students' mathematical modelling performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 53-78

Book Chapters and Conference Proceedings (peer-reviewed)

Blomberg, J., Schukajlow, S., & Rellensmann, J. (2020). "Why don't you make a drawing?" Motivation and strategy use in mathematical modelling. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 46-54). Khon Kaen, Thailand: PME

Rellensmann, J. (2019). Selbst erstellte Skizzen beim mathematischen Modellieren. Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.

Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., & Rellensmann, J. (2019). I enjoy making drawings! Enjoyment, knowledge about drawings, use of drawings, and students' performance. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 297-304). Pretoria, South Africa: PME

Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., & Rellensmann, J. (2019). I am scared to make a drawing. Students' anxiety and its relation to the use of drawings, modelling, and gender. In U. T. Jankvist, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.

Teacher Journals

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Blomberg, J. (2021). Was ist eine gute Skizze? [What is a good drawing?] mathematik lehren, 124, 24-26

Conference Proceedings (not peer-reviewed)

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., & Leopold, C. (2020). Effekte des Skizzenwissens auf die Modellierungsleistung: Eine Interventionsstudie. In H.-S. Siller, W. Weigel, & J. F. Wörler (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2020 (pp. 757-760). WTM-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.37626/GA9783959871402.0

Blomberg, J., Schukajlow, S., Rellensmann, J., & Leopold, C. (2019). Ich weiß, wie eine gute Skizze aussieht – Erste Ergebnisse einer Interventionsstudie zur Förderung des Strategiewissens beim mathematischen Modellieren. In A. Frank, S. Krauss, & K. Binder (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2019 (pp. 1109-1112). Münster: WTM-Verlag

Blomberg, J., Schukajlow, S., & Rellensmann, J. (2018). Skizze? Brauche ich nicht! Zum Zusammenhang von Motivation und Strategienutzung beim Modellieren. In Fachgruppe Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Paderborn (Ed.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2018 (pp. 317-320). Münster: WTM-Verlag

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., Blomberg, J., & Leopold, C. (2018). Zeichne eine Skizze = Wirkungsvolle Intervention? Effekte einer Visualisierungsaufforderung beim mathematischen Modellieren. In Fachgruppe Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Paderborn (Ed.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2018. Münster: WTM-Verlag

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Leopold, C. (2015). Gute Skizze - Bessere Lösung? In F. Caluori, H. Linneweber-Lammerskitten, & C. Streit (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2015 (pp. 732-735). Münster: WTM